Lawyer and Analyst Disagree on Six-Year Single Tenure Proposal for Political Office Holders
A public affairs analyst and a lawyer have voiced conflicting opinions on the National Assembly’s proposed bill to establish a six-year single tenure for political office holders.
The bill, aimed at replacing the current four-year term with a single six-year term to reduce inefficiencies, has already undergone its first reading in the parliament. Sponsored by Ikenga Ugochinyere, representing the Ideato North/Ideato South Federal Constituency in Imo State, and supported by 50 other lawmakers, the proposal seeks to amend several sections of the 1999 Constitution.
Public affairs analyst Emma Jimo criticized the bill as unnecessary, given the nation’s pressing issues. He argued, “In light of the current challenges facing the country, this bill does not address our most urgent problems. While constitutional amendments are possible, this particular change does not ensure improved governance or better delivery of democratic benefits.”
Conversely, lawyer and rights advocate Taiwo Olawanle defended the National Assembly’s right to propose such amendments. He stated, “The National Assembly has the authority to propose changes to the Constitution, including a six-year single tenure. As the elected representatives of the people, they can make such decisions within their legal mandate. This proposal, while political, is within their legislative rights.”
Both perspectives highlight the ongoing debate over the potential impact and necessity of the proposed constitutional amendment.
