Oyo Kingmakers Challenge Governor Makinde: Take Evidence to Court, End Media Smear Campaign
The Oyomesi, the traditional kingmakers of Oyo, have called on Governor Seyi Makinde to present any evidence he has against them in a court of law, rather than continuing with what they describe as a smear campaign in the media.
The controversy stems from Makinde’s decision to bypass the Oyomesi’s recommendation of Prince Lukman Gbadegesin for the position of Alaafin of Oyo, appointing a new monarch instead. During the ceremony where the new Alaafin received his staff of office, the Governor made statements that the kingmakers have now publicly rejected.
In a formal letter addressed to the Governor and signed by their legal representative, Adekunle Sobaloju SAN, the kingmakers expressed their dissatisfaction with the Governor’s public comments, which they regard as damaging to their reputations. The letter was signed by High Chief Yusuf Akínade, Bashorun of Oyo; High Chief Wakeel Akindele, Lagunna of Oyo; High Chief Hamzat Yusuf, Akinniku of Oyo; Chief Wahab Oyetunji, acting Asipa of Oyo; and Chief Gbadebo Mufutau, acting Alapinní of Oyo.
“We respect Your Excellency’s right to defend your actions legally, particularly with the ongoing challenge to your decision. However, we remind you that the court is the proper venue for presenting evidence and arguments. The Oyomesi, out of respect for the office of the Governor, have refrained from engaging in public disputes. It is therefore troubling that you continue to make statements that undermine their integrity,” the letter reads.
The kingmakers further urged the Governor to avoid using the media or public opinion as a platform to legitimize what they consider unlawful actions. They stressed that if Makinde has any evidence to back his claims, it should be presented in court where it can be properly assessed.
“Maligning the Oyomesi, who are respected custodians of Oyo Kingdom’s traditions, harms not only their reputation but also the ongoing legal process. Such actions are not only defamatory but also undermine the high standards expected of the office of the Governor,” they wrote.
The kingmakers concluded by reminding the Governor that defamation carries legal consequences, and that he could be held accountable for his actions once his immunity expires.
