Politics

Lawmakers Propose Shifting Power to Appoint INEC Chair Away from President

Published by Tope Fakinlede on July 13th, 2025.

A proposed constitutional amendment under consideration by the House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review aims to change how the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is appointed. The bill seeks to involve the National Judicial Council (NJC) in the appointment process, with the goal of strengthening the autonomy and transparency of the country’s electoral body.

According to findings by Sunday PUNCH, the reform is part of efforts to enhance the credibility of the electoral system by reducing executive influence in INEC leadership appointments.

This proposal echoes recommendations made in 2007 by the Electoral Reform Committee led by the late Chief Justice Muhammadu Uwais. The committee had advised transferring the authority to appoint INEC board members from the President to the NJC. It also suggested that INEC’s budget be sourced directly from the Consolidated Revenue Fund to ensure financial independence.

Reacting to the initiative, former INEC Chairman Prof. Attahiru Jega praised the move, describing it as a positive step toward safeguarding the commission from political interference.

“This is a commendable proposal. It addresses long-standing concerns about executive dominance and promotes impartiality in electoral administration,” Jega said.

Samson Itodo, Executive Director of YIAGA Africa, also supported the idea, though he raised concerns about the neutrality of the NJC itself.

“While the intent may be to reinforce democratic principles, we must also question whether the NJC can truly remain above political interests,” Itodo noted.

Dr. Joe Okei-Odumakin, a pro-democracy advocate and founder of Women Arise, expressed cautious optimism. She acknowledged the potential influence of NJC recommendations but pointed out they are not binding on the President.

“The effectiveness of this reform will ultimately depend on how it’s implemented and whether those involved prioritize national interest and integrity,” she remarked.

Public affairs commentator Jackson Ojo also welcomed the proposal but voiced skepticism about its impact. He warned that the NJC, once brought into the process, could become politicized.

“People have long complained that the President should not have sole authority in picking the INEC Chair. While including the NJC is a move in the right direction, there’s no guarantee the process won’t be manipulated,” he said. “Unfortunately, trust in both the judiciary and the Council has been eroding, and this might not change much even with constitutional backing.”