Business, Lifestyle, Politics

Obi Is A Lesser Devil – Deji Adeyanju’s Controversial Statement

Published by Tope Fakinlede on December 3rd, 2024.

Obi Is A Lesser Devil – Deji Adeyanju’s Controversial Statement

Human rights activist and political commentator, Deji Adeyanju, recently made a striking remark about Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour Party in Nigeria. In a statement that has sparked significant debate, Adeyanju referred to Obi as “a devil,” but qualified him as “a lesser devil” in comparison to other political figures in the country.

Adeyanju’s comment, made during a public discussion, raised eyebrows due to its blunt nature and its potential to stir up controversy in the Nigerian political landscape. Known for his often provocative statements, Adeyanju elaborated on his position by criticizing Obi’s political actions and affiliations, while still suggesting that he posed a lesser threat compared to other figures in Nigerian politics.

The activist’s use of the term “devil” is likely metaphorical, referring to Obi’s role in Nigerian politics as being tainted by the country’s systemic issues, despite his perceived reformist and anti-corruption stance. The term “lesser devil” in Adeyanju’s context implies that while Obi might not be the ideal candidate or a savior, his approach to governance and his political record are less detrimental compared to others in the field.

This remark has provoked mixed reactions among Nigerians. Supporters of Obi’s presidential ambitions argue that such harsh criticism overlooks his efforts to bring about positive change and challenge the political status quo. On the other hand, Adeyanju’s critics view his statement as another example of his unyielding stance on Nigerian politics, where he often voices dissatisfaction with most political leaders.

As Adeyanju’s comment continues to circulate, it adds to the ongoing discourse on Nigeria’s political future, with many questioning the morality and integrity of its leaders. While Adeyanju’s critique of Obi may resonate with some, others argue that labeling any leader a “devil,” even a lesser one, diminishes the possibility of constructive political dialogue in a country yearning for reform.