Crime

Simon Ekpa Distances Himself from IPOB in Finnish Court, Claims Online Videos Are Mere Content Creation

Published by Tope Fakinlede on June 4th, 2025.

Simon Ekpa Distances Himself from IPOB in Finnish Court, Claims Online Videos Are Mere Content Creation

Simon Ekpa, a well-known separatist figure associated with the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has reportedly distanced himself from the proscribed group during legal proceedings in Finland. In his statement before the Finnish court, Ekpa allegedly described himself not as a political agitator, but as a “content creator,” asserting that his numerous videos circulating online were merely for entertainment and leisure purposes.

This position contrasts sharply with Ekpa’s public image and his previous rhetoric online, where he has been seen issuing directives and making statements in support of IPOB and its cause. His broadcasts have often sparked controversy, particularly within the Nigerian public sphere, where he has been accused of inciting unrest and supporting the sit-at-home orders in the South-East.

According to reports from the courtroom, Ekpa’s legal defense emphasized that his digital content should be interpreted as creative expression rather than political or militant advocacy. The court proceedings are part of an ongoing investigation into potential violations of Finnish and international laws, especially regarding incitement and the influence of foreign conflicts.

The development has drawn mixed reactions. Critics argue that Ekpa’s denial of affiliation with IPOB under legal scrutiny undermines the credibility of his previous public stance. Others see it as a strategic legal move to avoid criminal liability in Finland, where freedom of expression is protected but not absolute, particularly when linked to incitement or violence.

Authorities in both Nigeria and Finland continue to monitor the case closely. Meanwhile, legal experts suggest that the outcome could have significant implications for how diaspora activism is interpreted under international law, especially when digital content blurs the lines between political advocacy and incitement.